The Planet Mars
During the oppositions of 1862 and1864, we have made upwards
of 100 drawings of the planet Mars, on object of so much interest, from the
changing phases of its very Earth-like surface; and we trust that a selection
from them arranged so as to render a comparison of both series at once easy and
obvious. The recurrence of the markings in each series tends to the conclusion
of their general permanence, modified nethertheless apparently, by the
difference of position of the planet’s axis by atmospheric causes on its
surface, as is very observable in Nos. 1 and 6 of Mr Banks’ 1862 set, which
differ but a few minutes in Martial time.
![]() |
| Drawings by Mr Banks |
Each series shows the most interesting phases at intervals during one rotation, and the Nos of 1862 and 1864, synchronise respectively as far as practicable; but the exhibition of remarkable features has been deemed of mire consequence than a rigid adherence to differences in time. There is consequently, a greater interval between the first than the last three of each set.
The dark markings are usually supposed to be analogous to
our seas; but we suggest, for further consideration, whether when near the
centre of he disc, they exhibit the characteristic reflection n of a fluid
surface under a vertical sun? The southern “snow zone”, so conspicuous in 1862,
was much less striking during the last opposition, but the northern polar
regions, which has since come into view, appeared to have much diffused light
about it, terminated in some views, by luminous points, connected by a serrated
outline. This is most decidedly seen in Mr Green, No 4, 1864, where, from
irradiation, it sensibly impaired the true figure of the disc.
![]() |
| Drawings by Mr Green |
The drawings from which the accompanying series have been carefully reduced were, as already stated , made independently by Mr Banks at Ealing and Mr Green at St John’s Wood; and they venture, from their professional familiarity with the pencil, to claim for them the truthfulness which is acquired by practice in rendering upon paper the impressions made upon the eye whilst their fidelity to the originals has been secured by Mr Green lithographing them himself.
The instruments employed were by Mr Banks, a Tulley of 3.75
inch aperture and 63 inch focal length; by Mr Green a French object glass of
fine quality, 4.25 inch aperture and 58-inch focus. The powers used were from
160 to 240; less than the former being insufficient to bring out the details;
and a very few fine nights only allowing the use of the latter. Mr Banks found
a Kitchener’s Pancratic Tube, drawn out to 160, of much easier and sharper
definition when observing the “half tint markings” than a Huygenian 180, with
which the bright points were generally best seen.
In conclusion, we trust that this effort to excite in others
the interest we ourselves have felt will be kindly received by other amateurs,
and tend to draw their attention to the
planet during the next opposition in January 1867, when, as far at least as
increased diameter is concerned, the opportunity for observation will be
somewhat more favourable than during that now passed.
W L Banks, Ealing
N E Green St John’s Wood
February 14th 1865



No comments:
Post a Comment